At 9:30 today, the Haidian Court will publicly pronounce the case on the fast broadcast.
Last Friday, the Beijing Haidian Court conducted a public hearing on the defendant’s Shenzhen Express Broadcasting Technology Co., Ltd., the defendants Wang Xin, Wu Ming, Zhang Kedong, and Niu Wenju’s alleged crime of spreading pornographic goods for profit. Eventually, the company quickly pleaded guilty; Wang Xin: I apologize to the injured Internet users. Wang Xin defender: It is recommended that Wang Xin be sentenced in about three years.
Today, after the Haidian court read out the defendant’s corporate information and appointment status, quickly broadcast the company’s network service content, and its management of bad information and business conditions, it officially sent a verdict.
Sentencing content:
The fast broadcast company has the network security management obligations that network video information service providers should undertake.
The company and all defendants knew that there was a lot of obscene videos in the fast broadcast network system and they were involved in obscene video communication activities.
Its indiscriminate dissemination of pornographic videos by its Internet service system is indirect and intentional.
The fast-broadcasting company has the realistic possibility of undertaking the network security management obligation but refuses to perform the network security management obligation.
The acts of fast broadcasting companies and defendants have illegal profit-making purposes.
This case neither applies "technical neutral" liability exemption nor "neutral help behavior".
The rapid dissemination of the company’s large number of pornographic videos for the purpose of making profits constitutes a unit crime in the dissemination of pornographic material for profit. Wang Xin, Zhang Kedong, Wu Ming and Niu Wenju should all bear the corresponding criminal responsibility as the directly responsible person in charge of the rapid broadcast company.
The behavior of the rapid broadcast company does not fall under the “extraordinary circumstances†of the crime of profit-making for the dissemination of obscene articles as stipulated by the judicial interpretation.
The fast broadcasting company's release of obscene videos in large numbers and the acquisition of huge amounts of illegal interests should be deemed as "serious circumstances" and the circumstances of other cases in this case.
Judgment result
Zooke Connectors Co., Ltd. , https://www.zooke.com